"RON PAUL 2012 | END THE FED | FIGHT FASCISM"


Neocon Beck Talks Bat Snot with Ron Paul

January 25, 2010

in Ron Paul

Beck using a flawed premise to make his case? No way… not the beck I know.

Congressman Ron Paul was on Glenn Beck radio today and Beck agreed on more than you might think… (or is it just me?) which is in the first half of audio.

The 2nd half of the audio is where Beck’s brilliance is really showcased… (I report – with bias – you decide).

In the first part…

Beck: “We Agree the Fed is Absolutely Just Evil … However, sometimes we go off the tracks and that’s why I wanted to talk to him (Ron Paul) today

Beck: “would you say what I just about our view points is accurate?”

Dr. Paul: “It seems like You’ve nudged your way over a little bit closer to what I’ve been saying, so maybe you’ll come a little closer on these things we disagree on

Beck: “Oh, I have… I am not a guy afraid to admit when I am wrong… I didn’t really understand the progressive movement up until I’d say two years ago I really started to get a handle on it

Beck then plays some audio of Ron Paul talking CIA and they actually agree that the CIA is running the military operations in Pakistan and Afghanistan. (Really!…)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTgw5yN5_cQ 

Here in the second half of the audio we find out where Glenn Beck really “goes off the rails” with Dr. Paul…

Beck: “I agree with the premise…”

Beck: “I think we should pound the bat snot out of anybody who… you come over to our shores, you do something to us… we crush you. then we leave, we don’t rebuild you, we don’t even… we crush you and then we leave

Dr. Paul: “The big question there is who did the attacking and who are you going to crush?

Beck interrupts and saysI’m not talking about anything specific, I’m talking about if somebody comes after us, they hit us, WE HAVE EVIDENCE… we CRUSH them and then we Leave

Dr. Paul says he agrees that is if a missile left Cuba and hit NYC we both understand that we would. Beck then says yes and if it was just a cell and we HAVE EVIDENCE that Cuba (Government) was involved we would go after Cuba.

Ron Paul points out that the danger is with an event like the “underware bomber” and we start bombing Yemen because of it. Beck says unless we have evidence that the Yemen was involved.

Here is the Key: WHAT EVIDENCE do we have that the PAKISTAN GOVERNMENT is harboring terrorists and if they are NOT why do we “Bomb the bat snot out of them”?

If they ARE then Why do we GIVE THEM so much MONEY?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHHmNTfov0w

(Sidenote for those critically minded folks – “off the rails” is an inference that comes from Ozzy Osbourne’s Crazy Train where he says “AAAHHLL AAABOOOAARD HAA HA HA HA HA AYE AYE AYE mental wounds still screaming driving me insane im goin off the rails on the crazy train” – one might use it in conversational hypnosis.)

So now we get the truth, neocon Beck says “bomb the bat snot out of everybody”

Related posts:

  1. Ron Paul Talks Wikileaks and Neocon Foreign Policy
  2. Glenn Beck: Another sign you are in a militia: Congressman Paul
  3. Glenn Beck Talks H1N1 Vaccine with Bill O’Reilly
  4. Ron Paul Audit the Fed on Beck?
  5. Ron Paul Talks TeoCons with the Southern Avenger
  • michael

    Hey Joe, does it bug you that your church doesnt invite glenn beck or ron paul to speak at byu. instead they are having forums on why he does more harm than good. see http://www.deseretnews.com/article/705349270/BY… -instead, they are paying money to have your “so called New World Order architects, council on foreign relations and trilateral commission members” to come and speak. I hope you didnt buy gold, its dropped in value quite a bit the last month. I wish you the best with your site, just make sure you don't go too far to the fringe…

  • http://joerobertson.com Joe Robertson

    Hey Michael,

    Does it bother You that Zbig spoke at BYU?

    Who made the decision?
    Does the “person(s)” that made the decision see Zbig as a former NSA and current Foreign Policy advisor to POTUS (in “good” standing) or do they see him as one with an agenda that exploits the military-industrial complex?

    On Beck and Paul… how do you equate the two? One is a neocon calling himself a libertarian and the other is a Constitutionalist. What do I care if either speaks at BYU?

    Also, I want to thank you for the counsel by way of “caution”.
    Be sure to check back in and let me know when I get “to the fringe”.

Previous post:

Next post: